The appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence was dismissed as infructuous since the appellant had already completed the sentence of rigorous imprisonment.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous due to completion of sentence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRA-S-369-SB of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.03.2019
Captain Singh
....Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:- Mr. Karan Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Amandeep S. Gill, DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this appeal, appellant has laid challenge to judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.09.2017 of the trial Court, whereby appellant has been held guilty under Section 411 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.
Learned State counsel, filing custody certificate, submits that this appeal has rendered infructuous in view of the fact that appellant has completed the sentence.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) March 27, 2019 JUDGE R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.03.28 18:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Captain Singh
State of Punjab
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
