COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
Revision petitions dismissed as infuctuous with liberty to revive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.8775 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision.10.01.2019
Surjit Kaur ...Petitioner
Vs Shubeg Singh and another ...Respondents 2. C.R. No.8882 of 2017 Surjit Kaur ...Petitioner Vs Balbir Singh ...Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Nagar Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikasdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Baljeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate for the respondent.
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the revision petitions against the interim orders passed in pending suits have become infructuous, as the main suits itself have been decided.
In view of the statement made by the counsel for the respondent, the revision petitions are dismissed as having become infrcutuous. However, liberty is granted to the counsel for the petitioner to revive the petitions in case the statement is found to be incorrect.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
January 10, 2019 Pankaj* Whether Reasoned/Speaking No Whether Reportable No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.01.15 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Surjit Kaur
Shubeg Singh
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
