Petitioner failed to appear on the hearing date despite notice. The High Court dismissed the revision petition for non-appearance of the petitioner or his counsel.
The revision petition is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner or his counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Revision No.8357 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 16, 2019.
Pt. Murari Lal Jotshi through LRs
..........PETITIONER (s).
VERSUS
Amarjit Kaur and others
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: None.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
None has put in appearance on behalf of petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing i.e. 13.03.2019 none had appeared on behalf of petitioner and prior to that on 28.01.2019, lawyers were abstaining from work.
As per report, counsel for the petitioner has been informed telephonically, through email and also vide letter No.5504 dated 03.04.2019 but he has chosen not to appear.
Dismissed for non-appearance of petitioner or his counsel.
May 16, 2019. Sachin M.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Yes/No
SACHIN MEHTA 2019.05.16 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Pt. Murari Lal Jotshi through LRs
Amarjit Kaur and others
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
