In this revision petition, the petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the matter as withdrawn by an oral order of the single judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.12.09 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1
CR-5870-2019
103
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-5870-2019 Date of decision : 09.12.2019
Farsa Ram
... Petitioner
Versus
Jhabar and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present: Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner
wishes to withdraw the present revision petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( ALKA SARIN ) 09.12.2019 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Yogesh Sharma
Farsa Ram
Jhabar and others
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
