Inditex Trent Retail India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Dharmendra Kumar Sharma and Others

On a specific query put by this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had already filed an application before the Court under Order 1 Rule 10 for deletion of his name from the array of parties.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that one of Director of both the companies i.e petitioner and ITX Services India Pvt Ltd are same. The appointment letter to respondent No. 1 has been issued by ITX Services India Pvt Ltd.

¶15

Since the Director of petitioner and ITX Services India Pvt Ltd are same, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file an application for impleading ITX Services India Pvt Ltd by filing an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

¶16

Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶17

09.07.2019 (RITU BAHRI) G.Arora JUDGE

¶18

09.07.2019

¶19

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No

¶20

Gaurav Arora 2019.07.12 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Inditex Trent Retail India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dharmendra Kumar Sharma and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Inditex Trent Retail India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dharmendra Kumar Sharma and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pritam Singh Vs Ved Parkash and Ors.

Avtar Singh and Another Vs the Executive Engineer

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Kiranjeet Kaur and Others

Vikram Verma Vs Vijay Kumar Verma etc.

Gurjap Singh & Anr. Vs Harjit Kaur and Ors.

Prince through Father Amit Kuamr Vs Jasbir Singh and Others