The Court held that the impugned revision petition is rendered infructuous as the main civil suit pending at the time of filing has already been decided.
Disposed with the remark that the revision petition is infructuous as the main civil suit is already decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.12.03 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1
CR-2329-2015 (O&M)
216
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-2329-2015 (O&M) Date of decision : 03.12.2019
Shri Sanatan Dharam Education Society (Registered) and another
... Petitioners
Versus
Anil Goyal and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present: Mr. Anupam Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Harmanjeet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, has stated that during the pendency of the revision petition, main civil suit, itself, has been decided and therefore, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous.
( ALKA SARIN ) 03.12.2019 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Yogesh Sharma
Shri Sanatan Dharam Education Society (Registered) and another
Anil Goyal and others
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
