Revision petition disposed of on subsequent event where decree holder's recovery decree was satisfied by auction purchaser payment prior to decision.
Revision petition disposed of in terms of subsequent event regarding satisfaction of decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.2070 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision.26.03.2019
Bhajan Singh
...Petitioner
Vs
Jang Singh .Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. M.S. Yadav, Advocate for Mr. Sumeet Puri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Kumar Walia, Advocate for the respondent.
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
In pursuance to previous detailed order, learned counsel for the petitioner has brought on record zimini order dated 20.03.2019 whereby the decree preferred by the decree holder seeking recovery of money stands satisfied and even the money paid by the auction purchaser along with interest, as noticed in the previous order, has been paid. Statement recorded by the auction purchaser has also been brought. This fact is not disputed by Mr. Walia.
In view of the aforementioned fact, effect of the impugned order is effaced. The revision petition is disposed of in terms of aforementioned subsequent event.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
March 26, 2019 Pankaj* Whether Reasoned/Speaking Yes Whether Reportable No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.03.28 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Bhajan Singh
Jang Singh
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
