This oral order revised the lower appellate court's decision setting aside the status quo in a suit for injunction, maintaining the status quo dated 23.03.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CR No.1992 of 2015
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.1992 of 2015 Date of decision:16.05.2019
Vinod Kumar Giri and another
... Petitioners
Vs.
Bhajan Singh ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. G.S.Duhan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate for the respondent.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
The present revision petition is directed against the impugned order dated 03.01.2015 of the Lower Appellate Court setting aside the status quo granted by the trial Court in a suit filed by the petitioner-plaintiffs for injunction.
This Court, on 23.03.2015 while issuing notice of motion again ordered the status quo. The suit is stated to be pending for defendant's evidence.
Learned counsel for the respondent-defendant submitted that he is not averse in case the evidence is adduced as early as possible.
Instead of pondering upon the merit and de-merit of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the revision petition by maintaining the
SAVITA KADIAN 2019.05.17 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CR No.1992 of 2015
{2}
order dated 23.03.2015 with a direction to the trial Court to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible.
Revision petition stands disposed of.
| May 16, 2019 | (AMIT RAWAL) |
|---|---|
| savita | JUDGE |
| Whether Speaking/Reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
SAVITA KADIAN 2019.05.17 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition against the setting aside of status quo order should be allowed.
Vinod Kumar Giri
Bhajan Singh
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
