A non-speaking oral order in which the single judge fixed an advocate to record detailed reasons for a prior order without delving into substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.1788 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision:24.01.2019
Malayan Banking Berhad (Maybank) ... Petitioner
Vs.
Rakesh Handa and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Devmani Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Advocate for Mr. Rajat Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. K.P.S.Dhillon, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Mr. N.C.Kinra, Advocate for respondent No.6.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
For order, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of
even date passed in CR No.1787 of 2017 titled as Malayan Banking Berhad (Maybank) vs. Rakesh Handa and others.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 24, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAVITA KADIAN 2019.02.04 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Malayan Banking Berhad (Maybank)
Rakesh Handa
Others
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
