The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a contempt petition asserting that a prior order was stayed in a leave petition filed by the State, thus negating the basis for contempt. The rule was discharged.
Rule issued against the respondents stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
215
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-3520-2017 Date of Decision: May 01, 2019
Devi Chand
.....Petitioner
Versus
Shri Manpal Singh and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Present: Mr.Sajjid, Advocate for Mr.G.C.Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Ashish Yadav, Addl.AG, Haryana.
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the respondents states that in the LPA filed
by the State, the order dated 22.03.2017, compliance of which is sought in
this contempt petition, has been stayed.
In view of the same, no contempt is made out.
The same is dismissed accordingly.
Rule issued against the respondents stands discharged.
May 01, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable ? Yes/No
MEENU 2019.05.02 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Devi Chand
Shri Manpal Singh and others
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
