Petitioners sought disposal without rejoinder as respondents claimed encroachment removal via written statement; impugned rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
201
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1256-2015 Date of Decision: April 08, 2019
Surinder Kumar and others
.....Petitioners
Versus
Anurag Aggarwal and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Present: Mr.APS Gill, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.P.S.Bajwa, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr.B.S.Sidhu, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 and 5.
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that they do not wish to file any rejoinder and that the contempt petition be also disposed of in view of the written statement filed by the respondents that the encroachments have been removed.
Ordered accordingly.
Rule issued against the respondents stands discharged.
April 08, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable ? Yes/No
MEENU 2019.04.09 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Surinder Kumar and others
Anurag Aggarwal and others
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
