A COCP petition filed by the petitioner was disposed of by the High Court. The State counsel submitted that the grievance was redressed, which the petitioner did not object to. The rule was discharged and the petition allowed.
Rule discharged, petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1009 of 2018 Date of decision:20.3.2019
Jatinder Bir Singh
... Petitioner
Vs.
Hussan Lal and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Bhardwaj, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
Reply by way of affidavit of Sh. Hussan Lal, Secretary to Government of Punjab Department of Public Works (B&R), Chandigarh on behalf of respondent no.1 has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record.
Learned State counsel submitted that grievance of the petitioner has been redressed which has not been objected to by Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate.
In view of the aforementioned, no further action is required. Rule is discharged.
Petition is disposed of.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE March 20, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAVITA KADIAN 2019.03.25 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Jatinder Bir Singh
Husan Lal
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
