The Single Judge dismissed the cross-objection filed by the approvers in the revision under SANCTIONS clause, finding that the lower court failed to consider the relevance of the evidence adduced by the prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.796 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision.30.11.2018
Anil Kumar and others
....Appellants
Vs Joti Sarup and another ...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Harsh Manocha, Advocate for the appellants.
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission of
this Court for withdrawal of the appeal.
Ordered accordingly.
| (A |
MIT RAWAL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|
| November 30, | 2018 | |
| Pankaj* | ||
| Whether Reasoned/Speaking | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.12.01 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Anil Kumar and others
Joti Sarup and another
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
