The single‑sentence order permits withdrawal of the appeal after the appellant's counsel submits that the dispute is amicably resolved.
The appeal was permitted to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA-6565-2016 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-6565-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 22, 2018
Gurmail Singh and others
...Appellants
Versus
Gursewak Singh
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
Present: Mr. V.P.S. Mithewal, Advocate, for Mr. Vikram Satpal Anand, Advocate, for the appellants.
ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the dispute between the parties stands amicably resolved, nothing substantive survives in this appeal, and he be permitted to withdraw the same.
Ordered accordingly.
| (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2018 | |||
| Pkapoor | Whether Speaking/Reasoned: | YES / | NO |
| Whether Reportable: | YES / | NO |
Prashant Kapoor 2018.05.23 11:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Gurmail Singh and others
Gursewak Singh
ARUN PALLI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
