Appeal was dismissed due to non-furnishing of required affidavit by the appellant despite prior court orders and observation regarding potential dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA-6223-2016 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-16353-54-C-2016 in/and RSA-6223-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 25, 2018
Bimla Devi
...Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
Present: Mr. Pradeep Goyat, Advocate, for Mr. Sandeep Goyat, Advocate, for the appellant.
ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL)
Vide order, dated 14.03.2018, learned counsel for the appellant was granted time to furnish an affidavit in terms thereof. On the adjourned date, i.e. 01.05.2018, as the said order was not complied with, the matter was again adjourned for today with an observation that in the event of noncompliance the appeal would be dismissed. Unfortunately, the position is still the same, as the necessary affidavit has not been furnished. That being so, the Court is choice less, but to dismiss the appeal.
| (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2018 | |||
| Pkapoor | Whether Speaking/Reasoned: | YES / | NO |
| Whether Reportable: | YES / | NO |
Prashant Kapoor 2018.05.28 09:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Bimla Devi
State of Haryana and others
ARUN PALLI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
