Inderjit v. Hardev Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
A non-speaking order referring counsel to a separate reasoned judgment of even date passed in RSA No.3749 of 2016 titled Inderjit Singh vs. Hardev Singh for order. No substantive legal proposition derived.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.4406 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision:27.11.2018
Inderjit
... Appellant
Vs.
Hardev Singh
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Santosh Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
For order, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of
even date passed in RSA No.3749 of 2016 titled as Inderjit Singh vs. Hardev Singh.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Inderjit
- respondent
Hardev Singh
Coram
AMIT RAWAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/4406/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court