Single judge orally dismissed a second appeal as infructuous on the ground that an amicable settlement had been arrived at between the parties, rendering the cause of action extinct.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.4031 of 2017 Date of Decision.27.02.2018
Raj Bala ......Appellant
Vs
Sham Lal and others
........Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Rajeev Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties have compromised the matter and therefore, no cause of action survives in the present regular second appeal arising out of the judgments and decrees of the Courts below.
In view of the statement of the counsel appearing for the appellant, the second appeal is dismissed as having infructuous in view of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 27, 2018 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.02.28 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Raj Bala
Sham Lal and others
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
