Dismissed
Municipal Corporation v. Manju and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCRSA/3746/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.3746 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:30.08.2018
Municipal Corporation, Hisar
... Appellant
Vs.
Manju and another ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:None for the appellant. Mr. Drupod Sangwan, Advocate for Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Position
was not different on 21.10.2016.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 30, 2018 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAVITA KADIAN 2018.09.04 13:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Municipal Corporation, Hisar
Manju and another
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court