Dismissed
Devi Lal v. Bhoop Singh and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCRSA/3127/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
122
YOGESH SHARMA 2018.12.20 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-3127-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 15.12.2018
Devi Lal
... Appellant
Versus
Bhoop Singh and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Rajeev Godara, Advocate for the appellant. ****
AMIT RAWAL, J.
Learned counsel for the appellant has informed the Court that the judgment and decree dated 29.09.2003 rendered in Civil Suit No.891 of 2003 titled as 'Bhoop Singh V/s Mahadevi' was assailed by Mahadevi and she was not successful.
The present regular second appeal is arising out of the civil suit filed by Devi Lal being collateral of Mahadevi. In view of the fact that once sufferer of the decree has not been successful, the co-owner had no better chance. Moreover the both the Courts below have dismissed the suit. The appeal is also accompanied by application seeking 499 days in refiling. The reasons given in the application are not plausible.
In view of above, I do not find any illegality and perversity in the judgments and decrees of the Courts below, much less, no substantial question of law arises for determination. The present regular second appeal is dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits.
15.12.2018 ( AMIT RAWAL ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Devi Lal
Bhoop Singh and others
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court