An oral order holding an appeal infructuous as the decretal amount was deposited and the attached land released, leading to dismissal of the appeal.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Manoj Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 2018.05.21 09:03 I attest to the accuracy and HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH integrity of this document
RSA No.2960 of 1998 (O&M)
Paras Ram
....Appellant
Versus
The Ajouli C.A.S.S Ltd
....Respondent
Date of Order: 17.5.2018
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Arvind Mittal, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. I.S. Saggu, Advocate for the respondent.
AMIT RAWAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant points out that the present appeal has become infructuous as the amount decreed against the appellant stands deposited and the land attached pursuant to the Award has since been released.
Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the said
fact.
Dismissed as infructuous.
May 17, 2018 `(AMIT RAWAL) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
Paras Ram
The Ajouli C.A.S.S Ltd
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
