Disposed

Rajpal v. Karan Singh and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Nov 2018RSA/2646/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of regular second appeals regarding land encroachment. The court directed a fresh demarcation of the disputed land using a Total Station Machine by an experienced Naib Tehsildar within three months of the order, with the appellant bearing the cost and parties joining after notice.

What did the court decide?

Order for fresh demarcation of land via Total Station Machine within three months by experienced Naib Tehsildar; appellant to bear cost; second appeals disposed of.

Rajpal Vs Karan Singh and Ors. — Landlord and Tenant | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

RSA No.2646 of 2016 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

RSA No.2646 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Order: 29.11.2018

Rajpal

..Appellant

Versus

Karan Singh and others

¶7

..Respondents

¶8

RSA Noo.2647 of 2016

¶9

Hukam Singh and others

¶10

..Appellants

¶11

Versus

¶12

Karan Singh and others

¶13

..Respondents

¶14

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

¶15

Present: Mr. Nipun Vashist, Advocate, for the appellant(s)

¶16

Mr. Kulbhushan Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.

¶17

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral)

¶18

On 28.11.2018, after hearing the arguments at length, this court

¶19

had passed the following order:-

¶20

“ The dispute is with regard to encroachment of the land in excess of their ownership by the appellant and other defendants.

¶21

Learned counsel for the appellant(s) have tried to point out certain errors in the demarcation report. Appellant(s) have been offered to get the land demarcated through Total Station Machine(TSM) which

¶22

NARESH KUMAR 2018.12.06 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶23

-2-

¶24

RSA No.2646 of 2016 (O&M)

¶25

is a GPS based machine.

¶26

Learned counsel for the appellant(s) seeks a short

¶27

adjournment to seek instructions in this regard.

¶28

Adjourned to 29.11.2018.

¶29

A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.

¶30

To be listed in urgent.”

¶31

The only dispute between the parties is with respect to encroachment of the land by the appellant, which has been found by a revenue officer who carried out demarcation on 04.12.2005.

¶32

Learned counsels for the parties are ad-idem that let a fresh demarcation be got carried out through “theodolite” (Total Station Machine) and parties would be free to join. The demarcation shall be carried out after issuing notice to both the parties. However, once the demarcation has been carried out through “theodolite” in the presence of the parties, they shall not be entitled to raise any objection. Of course, the parties would be at liberty to point out any error in the demarcation to the concerned officials. The demarcation would be carried out by an experienced Naib Tehsildar, who would be accompanied by concerned Kanungo and Halqa Patwari with the entire record.

¶33

The appellant would pay the cost of demarcation.

¶34

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the demarcation be carried out after 23.01.2019.

¶35

Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.

¶36

Deputy Commissioner, Rewari, is requested to depute an experienced Naib Tehsildar to carry out the demarcation within 3 months

¶37

NARESH KUMAR 2018.12.06 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶38

RSA No.2646 of 2016 (O&M)

¶39

-3-

¶40

from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order accompanied by an application to that effect.

¶41

In view thereof, both the regular second appeals are disposed

¶42

of.

¶43

November 29, 2018 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) nt JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶44

NARESH KUMAR 2018.12.06 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Rajpal v. Karan Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajpal v. Karan Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raman @ Raj Kaur Vs Gurmeet Singh

Raj Kumar and Anr. Vs Lakhwinder Singh and Anr.

Vijay Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Tej Kaur Vs Chhinder Kaur and Ors.

M/S Balwant Lal Ashok Kumar Vs Agro Chem. Pb Ltd. and Anr.

Om Parkash and Others Vs Ashok Kumar and Others