Appealed against an order condoning delay. Court found reasons valid and affidavit supported. Condoned 4-day delay and allowed the commutation motion relating to RSA No.1391 of 2016.
Delay of four days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.2215 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision:15.11.2018
Sudhir and another
... Appellants
Vs.
Yudhvesh and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Jangvir Singh Hooda, Advocate for the appellants.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
C.M.No.5786-C of 2016
For the reasons stated in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit, delay of 04 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.
C.M stands allowed.
RSA No.2215 of 2016 (O&M)
For order, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in RSA No.1391 of 2016 titled as Ratna (since deceased) through LRs Versus Yudhvesh and others.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE November 15, 2018 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAVITA KADIAN 2018.11.20 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Sudhir and another
Yudhvesh and others
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
