The High Court dismissed a regular second appeal challenging the dismissal of a suit and affirming the lower appellate decree. The court held the appeal was not maintainable due to the absence of a decree. No ground was found for interference.
Allowance of no relief; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2018.12.15 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1
RSA-1993-2016 (O&M)
105
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-1993-2016 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.12.2018
Surmukh Singh
... Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Singh (deceased) through LRs and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Saurabh Arora, Advocate for the appellant.
AMIT RAWAL, J.
Surmukh Singh/appellant/defendant No.1 has preferred the appeal against the dismissal of the suit filed by the plaintiff before the trial Court as well as affirmation in appeal. In the absence of the decree, the appeal is not maintainable.
No ground is made out for interference.
The present regular second appeal is dismissed.
13.12.2018 ( AMIT RAWAL ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No
Whether Reportable Yes/ No
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the second appeal is maintainable in the absence of a decree.
Interim relief in the second appeal.
Surmukh Singh
Mohinder Singh (deceased) through LRs
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
