The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as the appellants failed to appear on the hearing date without any representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-8183-2015
Date of decision: 26.04.2018
Kailash Rani and others
..... Appellants
Versus
Himanshu and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: None for the appellants.
Mr. Nikhil K. Chopra, Advocate for respondent No. 3-Insurance Company.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Perusal of the file shows that on the previous date also, the appellants have gone un-represented.
From the above factual position, it can safely be presumed that
the appellants or their counsel are no more interested in pursuing the instant appeal. Resultantly, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution.
April 26, 2018 rishu
( RAMENDRA JAIN ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable
Yes/No
Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2018.04.30 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Kailash Rani and others
Himanshu and others
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
