Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as appellants failed to appear; connected civil matter disposed of. Oral order.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; pending civil matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Anuradha 2018.03.14 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
379
FAO No. 274 of 1996 (O&M) Date of Decision : 8.3.2018
Bachiter Singh and others
....Appellants
VS
Union of India and another ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
Present: None.
AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral)
The matter has been constantly listed for the past many days
and has repeatedly been adjourned since none has been appearing for the appellants. Even today none has entered appearance on behalf of the appellants.
In the circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Since the main case has been decided, the pending C.M, if any, also stand disposed of.
8.3.2018 (AJAY TEWARI) anuradha JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned - Yes/No Whether reportable - Yes/No
Bachiter Singh and others
Union of India
Ajay Tewari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
