Veena v. Ramesh Chand and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This oral judgment denies a separate reportable opinion party that a detailed written order was passed on the same date for related applications Veena v. Ramesh Chand and others.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No. 2720 of 2001 Date of decision:- 19.01.2018
Veena
...Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Chand and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:Mr. P.S. Rana, Advocate for the appellant
Mr. Paul S. Saini, Advocate for for respondent Nos. 3 and 5
RITU BAHRI J. (Oral)
For detail order, see FAO No. 2719-2001 titled as Manisha
Chaturvedi v. Ramesh Chand and others , decided on even date.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the present FAO in light of a detailed order passed on the same date.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Veena
- respondent
Ramesh Chand and others
Coram
Riti Bahri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAO/2720/2001
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court