The document text is illegible due to severe OCR errors or encoding corruption and contains no substantive legal content. No facts, legal principles, parties, or decision can be extracted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������
����������������������������������������������� ����������������������
������
�������������������� � !"�����"#$%$�&'��(���������
�����
�"&!) *��&$+")%$!,����� ), & -�.�/$&0")1 )/�
�����������"!$!$�&")�
2%��
�! !"����� ), & � &0��!/")%��
�����������"%3�&0"&!%�
������
����.'����4�5��.������������6����6�.��������
������
�)"%"&!'�7���.)��8 &�� *-��0+�# !"-�� ��)�!/"�3"!$!$�&")���
������
��6����6�.�������-����9���5:�
5" )&"0�#�;&%"*���)�!/"�3"!$!$�&")�/ %�%;<8$!!"0�!/ !�!/"�
3)"%"&!�3"!$!$�&�/ %�<"#�8"�$&�);#!;�;%���
�$%8$%%"0� %�$&�);#!;�;%����
����������9��6����6�.�������:� �(���������� ���������������������� ������ �/"!/")�%3" =$&1�>)" %�&"0�'� �"%>��� �/"!/")��"3�)! <*"�� '� �"%>��
Vivek Pahwa 2018.05.04 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
