Balbir Singh v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous on ground that petitioner is on parole.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous on ground that petitioner is on parole.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-9128-2018 (O & M) Date of decision: 29.05.2018
Balbir Singh
…. Petitioner
V/s
State of Haryana and ors.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rohit Arya, AAG, Haryana.
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present petition
has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner is on parole at present.
In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as having been
rendered infructuous.
(RAJAN GUPTA) May 29, 2018 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sukhpreet Kaur 2018.06.01 22:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Balbir Singh
State of Haryana
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court