Disposed

N.K.Satwinder Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC10 Oct 2018CWP/6371/1994

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court allowed a Civil Writ Petition filed by an ex-army personnel seeking disability pension and arrears. The Court observed that under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the matter was cognizable by the Tribunal and ordered the transfer of proceedings to the appropriate Regional Bench.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of the proceedings to the Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh Regional Bench at Chandimandir.

N.K.Satwinder Singh Vs Union of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH

¶2

Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 6371 of 1994 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 10. 10. 2018

¶3

Ex. Nk. Sat wi nder Si ngh

¶4

…. . Pet i t i oner

¶5

ver sus

¶6

The Secr et ar y, Govt . of I ndi a, Mi n. of Def ence and anot her

¶7

. . . . . Respondent s

¶8

CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI

¶9

Pr esent : None f or t he pet i t i oner

¶10

Shr i O. P. Dabl a, Sr . Counsel , UOI , f or t he r espondent s

¶11

KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE : ( Or al )

¶12

Case cal l ed out . No one appear s on behal f of t he pet i t i oner t o pr ess t hi s wr i t pet i t i on. However , we have per used t he r ecor d of t he case.

¶13

By means of t hi s pet i t i on f i l ed under Ar t i cl e 226 of t he Const i t ut i on of I ndi a, t he pet i t i oner , an ex- ar my per sonnel , af t er bei ng pl aced i n medi cal cat egor y “ E” EEE, has made a pr ayer t o sanct i on and pay di sabi l i t y pensi on as al so t he i nt er est @ 24% per annum on t he ar r ear s on account of del ay i n payment .

¶14

I n vi ew of sect i on 14 of t he Ar med For ces Tr i bunal Act , 2007, t he mat t er i s cogni zabl e by t he Ar med For ces Tr i bunal . I n vi ew of sect i on 34 of t he sai d Act , t hese pr oceedi ngs ar e l i abl e t o be t r ansf er r ed t o Ar med For ces Tr i bunal , Chandi gar h Regi onal Bench at Chandi mandi r .

¶15

PARKASH CHAND 2018.10.11 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

CWP- 6371- 1994

¶17

- 2 -

¶18

Accor di ngl y, t he r egi st r y of t hi s Cour t i s di r ect ed t o t r ansf er t hese pr oceedi ngs bef or e t he Ar med For ces Tr i bunal , Chandi gar h Regi onal Bench at Chandi mandi r ,

¶19

f or t hwi t h.

¶20

( KRI SHNA MURARI ) CHI EF JUSTI CE

¶21

( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

¶22

1. 2018 par kash

¶23

NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO

¶24

PARKASH CHAND 2018.10.11 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

N.K.Satwinder Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.K.Satwinder Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Haryana and Others Vs Dharmvir

State of Haryana and Ors. Vs Roop Singh

Sanjay Kumar Vs State Bank of Patiala and Ors.

Sukhjit Singh Vs UOI and Others

Malkiat Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Gursewak Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.