Petitioner withdrew writ petition seeking liberty to pursue Section 30 reference pending before competent court.
Liberty granted to approach the competent Reference Court regarding the pending petition under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 6253 of 2018 Date of decision: 14.03.2018
Shadi Ram
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Gram Panchayat, Bhagthala and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. S.S. Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, counsel does not press the present writ petition and seeks liberty for redressal of his grievances before the competent Court which is the Reference court since a petition under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is already pending there.
Ordered accordingly.
14.03.2018 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Shivani Gupta 2018.03.15 14:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shadi Ram
Gram Panchayat, Bhagthala
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
