Disposed

Suresh Kumar v. Chief Administrator Housing Board Haryana and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC13 Mar 2018CWP/6124/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an order cancelling LIG flat allotment. It directed the respondents to decide on a legal notice within two months by passing a speaking order after hearing the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.1 to take decision on legal notice dated 08.01.2018 by passing a speaking order and affording hearing opportunity within two months.

Suresh Kumar Vs Chief Administrator… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

-1-

¶2

CWP-6124-2018

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP-6124-2018

¶5

Date of Decision: 13.3.2018

Suresh Kumar

....Petitioner.

Versus

The Chief Administrator, Housing Board Haryana and another

¶10

...Respondents.

¶11

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL

¶12

PRESENT: Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶13

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.

¶14

In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 28.4.2014 (Annexure P-3) to the extent not to deduct 10% amount and to release the amount deposited by the petitioner along with interest.

¶15

In pursuance to the public notice issued by the respondents, the petitioner applied for a LIG Flat which was allotted in Housing Board Colony, Sector 4 (Part II), Hisar, vide allotment letter dated 10.10.2013 (Annexure P-1). The petitioner deposited all the dues vide receipts (Annexure P-2 Colly). Respondent No.1 vide letter dated 28.4.2014 (Annexure P-3) cancelled the said allotment. Accordingly, the petitioner served a legal notice dated 8.1.2017 (Annexure P-4) upon the respondents

¶16

Gurbachan Singh 2018.03.22 15:56I attest to the accuracy andto release the entire amount along with interest, but no response has been integrity of this document

¶17

CWP-6124-2018

¶18

-2-

¶19

received till date. Hence, the present writ petition.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for the relief claimed in the writ petition, the petitioner has sent a legal notice dated 8.1.2018 (Annexure P-4) to the respondents, but no action has so far been taken thereon.

¶21

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, perusing the present petition and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we dispose of the present petition by directing respondent No.1 to take a decision on the legal notice dated 8.1.2018 (Annexure P-4), in accordance with law by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order.

¶22

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE

¶23

March 13, 2018 (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) gbs JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

¶24

Gurbachan Singh 2018.03.22 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Suresh Kumar v. Chief Administrator Housing Board Haryana and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar v. Chief Administrator Housing Board Haryana and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vipul Sachdeva Vs Central Board of Secondary Education and Others

Kulbhushan Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Vijay Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Jagdeep Singh Rekhi Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Nanak Singh Sarpanch and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Asha Rani and Others Vs State of Haryana and Ors.