M/S Haryana Urban Development Authority v. the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 334 of 2016 Decided on : 14.05.2018
M/s Haryana Urban Development Authority
. . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
PRESENT: Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M.S. Kanda, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing Counsel for the respondent.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, A.C.J. (Oral)
The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing of the demand notice issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1995 (in short 'the IT Act'), dated 08th December, 2015 (Annexure P-6) as well as the order passed on 06.01.2016 (Annexure P-10) on the stay application for the Assessment Year 2009-10. A further prayer has also been made for directing the respondents to keep in abeyance the demand of penalty amounting to `1,99,07,63,318/-, during the pendency of appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax.
CIT(A) has been filed in Court today, which is taken on record, subject to all just
Jawala Ram 2018.05.18 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CWP No. 334 of 2016
- 2 -
exceptions.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
May 14, 2018 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
(TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) JUDGE
Jawala Ram 2018.05.18 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
M/s Haryana Urban Development Authority
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court