Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate forum. The High Court allowed withdrawal accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.25599 of 2018 Date of decision:05.10.2018
Mukhtiar Singh
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Block Development Officer, Ludhiana-II and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Dinesh Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has instructions from the petitioner, who is present in Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail any other appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
Ordered accordingly.
(Rajesh Bindal)
Judge
(Amit Rawal) Judge 05.10.2018 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAVITA KADIAN 2018.10.09 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Mukhtiar Singh
The Block Development Officer, Ludhiana-II
Rajesh Bindal
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
