This High Court disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claims regarding pension refixation and payment of arrears, and to provide a written decision within three months.
Respondents directed to consider claim and pass decision within 3 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.21093 OF 2018
--1--
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.21093 OF 2018 DECIDED ON: SEPTEMBER 25, 2018
AMAR SINGH
....PETITIONER..
VS.
HARYANA VIDUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD. AND ANR.
....RESPONDENTS..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH
Present:Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner.
JASPAL SINGH, J.
Through instant petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to refix the pension, who retired on 30.04.1992 by giving effect to the Memo dated 03.04.1998 (P-11) whereby he was allowed benefit of deemed date of promotion as Commercial Assistant w.e.f. 15.07.1968 and consequential promotions. And further to make the payment of arrears of pension, difference of pay of the promotion posts after adjusting the pay received by him as Upper Division Clerk and pay other retiral benefits alongwith interest @ 12% per annum from the date the amount became due, till actual payment.
CWP No.21093 OF 2018
--2--
one dated 18.11.2017 and 04.04.2018 but till date neither any response has been received nor any conscious decision has been taken by the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner feels satisfied in case direction is issued to respondents to decide representation dated 18.11.2017 and 04.04.2018, in a time bound manner.
SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: Yes/No
SONIKA 2018.10.16 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be directed to obtain concrete decisions on their pension grievance representations within a specific time frame.
Whether the respondents are directed to issue an order clarifying the petitioner's pension benefits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amar Singh
Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Ltd. and Anr.
Jaspal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
