This is a short order dismissing a writ petition challenging land acquisition under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on account of delay and latches.
The writ petition was dismissed on account of delay and latches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Yogesh Sharma 2018.08.27 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.20046 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.08.2018
Raghbir Singh
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr.Kartar Singh Malik-I, Advocate for the petitioner. ****
RAJESH BINDAL, J.
Acquisition of land, for which, notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the 1894 Act') were issued on 15.12.2006 and 18.10.2007, respectively, has been impugned by filing the present writ petition, where award was announced by the Land Acquisition Collector on 14.03.2008.
Plea of discriminatory is sought to be raised. Even in the case, which has been cited the land was released before the award was announced by the Collector. There being huge delay in challenging the acquisition, even after the award was announced, the present writ petition deserves to be dismissed on account of delay and latches only.
Ordered accordingly.
( RAJESH BINDAL ) JUDGE
( AMIT RAWAL ) 13.08.2018 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition deserves to be dismissed on account of delay and latches.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raghbir Singh
State of Haryana
RAJESH BINDAL
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
