The Saroop Singh Wala Co. Op Labour and Construction Society Ltd. v. State of Punjab and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 15385 of 2018 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 19. 09. 2018
The Sar oop Si ngh Wal a Co- op. Labour & Const r uct i on Soci et y Li mi t ed
…. . Pet i t i oner
ver sus
St at e of Punj ab and ot her s
CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI , JUDGE
KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE ( Or al ) :
At t he ver y out set , l ear ned counsel f or t he pet i t i oner made a pr ayer t o per mi t wi t hdr awal of t hi s wr i t pet i t i on and t o di smi ss t he same as wi t hdr awn wi t h l i ber t y t o par t i ci pat e i n t he f r esh t ender pr ocess whi ch has been i ssued by t he r espondent s.
Lear ned Assi st ant Advocat e Gener al appear i ng f or t he St at e of Punj ab has no obj ect i on t o t he pr ayer bei ng gr ant ed.
Accor di ngl y, t he wr i t pet i t i on st ands di smi ssed as wi t hdr awn wi t h l i ber t y t o t he pet i t i oner t o par t i ci pat e i n t he f r esh t ender pr ocess.
( KRI SHNA MURARI ) CHI EF JUSTI CE
( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE
par kash
NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO
PARKASH CHAND 2018.09.20 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
PARKASH CHAND 2018.09.20 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
The Saroop Singh Wala Co-op. Labour & Construction Society Limited
State of Punjab
Krishna Murari
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court