Petitioner unsuccessfully applied to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. The court granted the withdrawal order.
Permitted the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one giving better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.11419 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision.08.08.2018
Sourav Verma
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Haryana and others
Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Raje Ram Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.
-.-
RAJESH BINDAL J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one giving better particulars.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
August 08, 2018 Pankaj*
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
Yes/No
Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.08.09 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sourav Verma
State of Haryana
RAJESH BINDAL
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
