Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal revision petition, which the court dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Revision No. 3650 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 06, 2018
Pardeep Kumar
........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. H.S.Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
Mr. Ramandeep Sandhu, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has
rendered infructous and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE September 06, 2018 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Jyoti 2018.09.07 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Pardeep Kumar
State of Punjab
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
