Allowed
Tarshinder Garg v. Ut of Chandigarh & Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRR/2710/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-2710-2016 (O&M) Decided on: January 9, 2018.
Tarshinder Garg
.. Petitioner
VERSUS
State of U.T. Chandigarh and another
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
PRESENT Mr.H.S.Randhawa, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Gautam Kaile, Advocate, for Mr.Rajiv Sharma, Addl. Public Prosecutor for U.T. Chandigarh.
Mr.I.P.S.Bains, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
For orders see CRM-A-1526-MA of 2017, titled Jagir
Singh Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh and others .
(M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE
January 9, 2018. (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No
Raj Kumar Arora 2018.01.12 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jagir Singh Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh and othersFollowed¶15
CRM-A-1526-MA of 2017, titled Jagir Singh Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh and others
Tarshinder Garg
State of U.T. Chandigarh
Rajiv Sharma
M.M.S. Bedi
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court