The High Court dismissed a revision petition filed by Seo Ram against the State of Haryana for want of prosecution, as the petitioner failed to appear despite multiple hearings starting from 10.05.2016.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-1766-2010 (O&M)
Date of decision: 26.07.2018
Seo Ram
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: None for the petitioner.
Mr. AS Yadav, AAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Custody certificate of the petitioner filed by learned State counsel is taken on record. Office to tag the same at the appropriate place.
Despite the case having been called twice, the petitioner has gone un-represented.
Perusal of the file shows since 10.05.2016, this case has been taken up for hearing several times, but none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that the petitioner or his counsel is no more interested in pursuing the instant revision.
Resultantly, this revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
July 26, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2018.07.30 11:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Seo Ram
State of Haryana
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
