This order refers to a detailed order passed in a connected matter on the same date and does not contain independent reasoning, decision, or substantive direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.A-970-MA of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 23, 2018
Sudhir Kumar Yadav
...Applicant
Versus
Rakesh Kumar
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.J.P.Jangu, Advocate for the applicant.
INDERJIT SINGH, J.
For detailed order, see order passed in CRM No.A-968-MA of
2017 titled as Sudhir Kumar Yadav vs. Rakesh Kumar of even date.
August 23, 2018 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
VINEET GULATI 2018.09.18 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Sudhir Kumar Yadav
Rakesh Kumar
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
