The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous due to the framing of charges and ongoing trial, granting liberty to revive if grievances persist.
Petition disposed of as infructuous with liberty to revive if any grievance survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-9578 of 2017 Date of Order: 02.08.2018
Jyoti Mehta
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and Ors.
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Himanshu Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Satish Saini, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Deepak Girotra, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 to 8.
SUDHIR MITTAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the respondents submit that the present
petition has been rendered infructuous as the charges have already been framed and the trial is in progress.
Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to
the petitioner to revive the petition, in case, any grievance survives.
August 02, 2018 (SUDHIR MITTAL) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2018.08.06 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jyoti Mehta
State of Haryana
Sudhir Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
