Disposed

Sarla v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Dec 2018CRM-M/61764/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition by directing the respondent authority to decide a pending representation regarding the petitioner's safety within six weeks, without adjudicating on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 22.11.2018 within six weeks and take necessary action.

Sarla Vs State of Haryana and… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CRM-M-61764-2018 Date of decision: 20.12.2018

Sarla

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

¶7

...Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

¶9

Present: Mr. Narender Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶10

¶11

JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL)

¶12

The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a direction to official respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members at the hands of private respondent No. 6. In this regard the petitioner has also approached the authorities by filing representation dated 22.11.2018 (Annexure P-2) but till date no action has been taken by respondent No.2 on the same.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.2 be directed to look into the representation dated 22.11.2018 (Annexure P-2) and take action in accordance with law, in a time bound manner.

¶14

Notice of motion.

¶15

SATYAWAN 2018.12.20 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

CRM-M-61764-2018

¶17

-2-

¶18

On asking of the Court, Mr.P.P. Chahar, learned DAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4. Five copies of the petition be handed over to him by learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day failing which no action is called for. He submits that the representation dated 22.11.2018 (Annexure P-2) will be decided within a period of six weeks.

¶19

Heard.

¶20

Without going into the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 22.11.2018 (Annexure P-2), within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order and take necessary action in accordance with law.

¶21

20.12.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes. Whether reportable No.

¶22

SATYAWAN 2018.12.20 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Sarla v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarla v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pretty @ Simpy and Anr. Vs Hardeep Singh

Jasbir Kaur @ Jasvir Kaur @ Sheero Vs State of Punjab

Narinder Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Latish Dua Vs State of Haryana

Vikas Vs State of Punjab

Vikas Vs State of Haryana