In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the court made an interim order (dated 09.02.2018) in favour of the petitioner absolute due to the petitioner's unconditional joinder in investigation.
Interim order dated 09.02.2018 in favour of the petitioner is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-5569 of 2018 Date of decision: 05.09.2018
Ravinder Singh
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Rajnikant Upadhyay, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined investigation and the same has been affirmed by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Balwan Singh.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel, interim order dated 09.02.2018 passed by this Court in favour of the petitioner is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
05.09.2018 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
NEETU RANI 2018.09.06 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Ravinder Singh
State of Haryana
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
