In a bail and remand matter, the petitioner sought to effect the cops and put forth that the petition was rendered infructuity due to the claws of the bail ordered under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. The court disposed of the petition accordingly without further jurisdiction or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M- 45085 of 2017(O&M) Date of Decision: February 05 , 2018.
Hardeep Singh
...... PETITIONER (s)
Versus
State of Punjab
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: Mr. Rishu Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Seena Mand, DAG, Punjab.
LISA GILL, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has been
rendered infructuous as the petitioner has been afforded bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.
Disposed of accordingly.
( LISA GILL ) February 05 , 2018. JUDGE ‘om’
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Omkar Singh 2018.02.07 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Hardeep Singh
State of Punjab
Lisa Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
