Allowed

Chander Parkash v. Ut of Chandigarh and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Aug 2018CRM-M/41904/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral judgment under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed a petitioner's petition for quashing an FIR registered under Section 304-A IPC. The court quashed the FIR and subsequent proceedings subject to the payment of costs totaling `10,000, to be deposited with the Chief Minister's Distress Relief Fund and the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No. 0269 dated 02.09.2017 registered under Section 304-A IPC and all subsequent proceedings. Costs of `10,000 to be deposited.

Chander Parkash Vs Ut of Chandigarh and Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

CRM-M-41904-2017

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-41904-2017

¶5

Date of decision: 29.08.2018

Chander Parkash

..... Petitioner

Versus

U.T. Chandigarh and another

¶10

..... Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

¶12

PRESENT: Mr. Amaninder Preet, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶13

Mr. Kr. Yashwant Singh Rathore, Addl. PP for U.T. Chandigarh.

¶14

Mr. AP Singh, Advocate for Mr. Hitesh Mittal, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

¶15

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)

¶16

Through this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for quashing FIR No. 0269 dated 02.09.2017 (Annexure P-1) registered under Section 304-A IPC at Police Station Sector-31, Chandigarh and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 02.09.2017 (Annexure P-2), effected between the parties. 2. Reply filed by learned Addl. P.P. for U.T. Chandigarh on behalf of respondent No. 1 is taken on record. Office to tag the same at the appropriate place.

¶17

Learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submit that a compromise has been effected between the parties and they have no objection, if, the impugned FIR (Annexure P-1) is

¶18

RISHU KATARIA 2018.09.05 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

CRM-M-41904-2017 -2-

¶20

quashed.

¶21

In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances and considering the fact that the compromise will bring harmony and peace in relations between the parties, this petition is allowed and the aforesaid, FIR No. 0269 dated 02.09.2017 (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, qua the petitioner are quashed, subject to payment of costs of 10,000/-, out of which 8,000/- shall be deposited with

¶22

the following account:-

¶23

Account details:-	Chief Minister's Distress Relief Fund.
Account Number :-	67319948232
Bank:-	State Bank of India.
Branch:-	City Branch, Thiruvananthapuram
IFSC:-	SBIN0070028
PAN:-	AAAGD0584M
Account Type:-	Savings
SWIFT Code:	SBININBBT08

¶24

and `2,000/- with the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana, within 10 days from today, failing which this petition shall be deemed to be dismissed.

¶25

List on 14.09.2018, for production of receipts regarding deposit

¶26

of costs.

¶27

August 29, 2018	( RAMENDRA JAIN )
rishu	JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶28

RISHU KATARIA 2018.09.05 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Chander Parkash v. Ut of Chandigarh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chander Parkash v. Ut of Chandigarh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeev Kumar Vs Murti Devi and Ors.

Poonam Singh Vs Seeta Devi

Ram Kumar Sharma Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Jogesh Kohli Vs Gurcharan Singh

Gurpreet Singh Chauhan Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Karamjeet Singh Vs State of Punjab