The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the second petition seeking regular bail filed by Ajay Kumar in a case involving alleged attempt to murder and arms offenses arising from a matrimonial dispute.
The petition for regular bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM M-4082 of 2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M-4082 of 2018
Date of decision : 23.02.2018
Ajay Kumar
....Petitioner
V/s
State of Haryana
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG Haryana.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
This is a second petition by the petitioner seeking regular bail in a case registered against him under sections 307/34 IPC and 25/54/59 of the Arms Act vide FIR No. 134 dated 23.02.2017 at police station Model Town Rewari, District Rewari. Complaint was lodged by one Prince Sharma. He alleged that there was a matrimonial dispute between his sister namely Jyoti and her husband Ajay Kumar (petitioner herein). Number of cases were pending between the parties. According to him, his sister was being regularly harassed. On 23.02.2017 at 7:25 A.M. his sister Jyoti alongwith her son Jagrit was going to Canal Velly School. At that time two persons on a motorcycle with their faces covered, came there. One of them fired towards Jyoti. She received a gunshot injury on her left breast. Thereafter, she was admitted to ICU.
In view of nature of allegations, the manner in which crime is alleged to have been committed and the punishment it would entail in case
Ajay Kumar 2018.03.06 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM M-4082 of 2018
2
of conviction, I am of the considered view that no case for enlarging the petitioner on bail is made out. Dismissed.
February 23, 2018 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ajay Kumar 2018.03.06 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in an offense under sections 307 IPC and Arms Act though no case for enlargement was made out.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ajay Kumar
State of Haryana
RAJAN GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
