Allowed

Pushpender @ Pushpender Singh v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Feb 2018CRM-M/39907/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the regular bail petition of Pushpender alias Pushpender Singh, an accused in an arms and attempted murder case. The court noted his conviction liability remains to be determined during trial and permitted bail subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release of Pushpender alias Pushpender Singh on bail upon furnishing bail and surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/CJM/Duty Magistrate.

Pushpender @ Pushpender Singh Vs State of Haryana — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

CRM-M No. 39907 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRM-M No. 39907 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- February 22, 2018

¶4

Pushpender alias Pushpender Singh ...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN

¶9

Present :- Mr. Ankur Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.

¶11

¶12

This petition for regular bail has been filed by petitioner Pushpender alias Pushpender Singh, an accused in F.I.R. No. 326 dated 13.7.2017 for offences under Sections 307, 387, 120-B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act registered with Police Station Gohana City, District Sonepat.

¶13

Briefly stated the facts of the case as per the prosecution story are that 13.7.2017, two persons with muffled faces went to the shop of Anil Goyal son of Giriraj Goyal situated at Baroda Road, Gohana at about 8.20 P.M. and demanded Rs.50 lacs and they fired shot in the air also. The two boys were later on identified as Amit @ Mota and Inderjit. Both of them have been arrested and are in custody. Name of the present petitioner cropped up during investigation as a co-conspirator to commit the offence having met Krishan at Rohtak Court and Sandeep @ Kala in Sonepat Jail.

¶14

Parvinder Singh 2018.02.22 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶15

CRM-M No. 39907 of 2017

¶16

He was arrested on 16.7.2017.

¶17

He had moved an application for regular bail, which was dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat vide order dated 3.10.2017, as such he has knocked the door of this Court for grant of regular bail. The petition is being opposed by the State counsel.

¶18

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned State counsel besides going through the record.

¶19

Admittedly, it is not a case of the prosecution that petitioner had participated in the incident rather he has been picked as a co-conspirator for the reason that he had been meeting the main accused in the Court Complex/jail. His guilt shall be determined during the trial. The trial though pending is at initial stage and its conclusion is likely to take some time.

¶20

Without going into the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner Pushpender alias Pushpender Singh is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/CJM/Duty Magistrate, Sonepat subject to the following conditions : -

¶21

(i) he shall appear in the Court on each and every date of

¶22

hearing.

¶23

(ii) he shall not give any threat or intimidation to the prosecution witnesses.

¶24

(iii) he shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court and shall surrender his Passport, if he has got one otherwise to furnish affidavit in that regard.

¶25

In addition to that the trial Court may impose any term and

¶26

Parvinder Singh 2018.02.22 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶27

CRM-M No. 39907 of 2017

¶28

condition found suitable to ensure that the petitioner does not abscond and interfere in the trial.

¶29

In case the petitioner violates any term and condition on which

¶30

the bail has been granted to him, the order shall be liable to be withdrawn.

¶31

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE February 22, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

¶32

Parvinder Singh 2018.02.22 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Pushpender @ Pushpender Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushpender @ Pushpender Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Swati Cast and Forge Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs M/S Kapoor Alloys and Anr.

Ram Rattan Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Jagwinder Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab

Kuldip Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Bhanwar Lal Vs Ajay Kumar and Others

Raj Singh Vs State of Punjab