The petitioner sought to withdraw a criminal petition. The court permitted the withdrawal but directed the trial court to expedite the trial given the custody status and stage of proceedings.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; trial Court directed to expedite trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-38589 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.07.2018
Manveer Malhotra
..Petitioner
Versus
State of U.T. Chandigarh
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Karan Vir Nanda, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Ashima Mor, Standing Counsel for the respondent-UT Chandigarh.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Admittedly, the complainant has not been examined so far and
the date fixed before the trial Court is 30.07.2018. Out of total 15 witnesses, seven have been examined upto 18.05.2018 and one witness has been given up.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this
petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
However, keeping in view the custody as well as the stage of trial, the trial Court is directed to make all efforts to expedite the trial.
27.07.2018 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
Neetu Rani 2018.07.31 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Manveer Malhotra
State of U.T. Chandigarh
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
