The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the date of hearing. No substantive reasoning or legal proposition was provided in this brief order.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-35821-2017 Date of decision: 02.11.2018
Bhagyajit Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr.Bhupinder Banga, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Kaile, Advocate, for Mr. Rajiv Sharma, APP for U.T. Chandigarh. Ms. Isha Goyal, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the instant
petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
02.11.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned No. Whether reportable No.
SATYAWAN 2018.11.12 12:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Bhagyajit Singh
Union Territory, Chandigarh
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
